Archive for topic “from my school days”

Is there a thinker in the house?

I am growing increasingly aware that my perspective on journalism education is far different from that of my classmates. I entered the graduate program at KU so that I might study why journalists do what they do, both good and bad. I came here thinking that I would be among a community of scholars that wants to think about what we are doing as journalists. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that just isn’t happening here.

I didn’t come here to be taught how to be a journalist. Personally, I don’t think that requires much training. I guess the only training I think you need to be a journalist is complete when someone hands you a pad of paper (or a digital camera or a digital recorder) and says, “Go find out what happened!” The rest is interdisciplinary.

You need to be a good writer, you need to take good pictures, you need computer skills, you need to be able to think on your feet, and you need to have an ethical frame of reference that recognizes the duty that journalists have in society, not a re-hash of Aristotle. Journalists are no less important than lawyers, yet are far less revered. I happen to think they are more important. Lawyers do not control the public’s perception of the world around them; journalists do. This is an awesome power that needs to be recognized and contemplated.

My classmates, at least in open discussion, do not do that.

They want job skills.

They are here to learn how to be journalists.

They are here to make good grades.

This is a problem.

This is not going to be the most popular blog entry of the week. People are going to be angry about this. I can see it now: “How dare you tell me what I am thinking?” “Who are you to sit in judgment of journalists?” I am a citizen. That should be enough. Moreover, I am a citizen in their midst. I am simply finding out what is happening. I am a journalist.

The future of journalism education is bleak unless we start talking about our impact in a serious manner. Let’s start today. Leave me a comment.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Tags: , , ,

What’s In A Catch Phrase?

I love catch phrases, especially when the mainstream media (MSM) gets a hold on them. (Do we smell the fetid stench of sarcasm?) In the never-ending quest to capture the life force of anything that seems to actually be thriving, the MSM has landed upon the Citizen Journalist. It isn’t just MSNBC that is trying to catch the authenticity of the eyewitness news. Hell, many local newscasts are called Eyewitness News.

The problem is, eyewitness news is hardly reliable. Defense attorneys and psychologists are the first to tell you that you cannot rely on what a person thought they saw. Entire academic departments are dedicated to the study of false memory. So what are these major media outlets doing trolling for citizen reports? My best guess is that they just want your pictures. Well, that, and they want you to feel empowered. Don’t let all this power go to your head. You citizen journalists aren’t bloggers.

Bloggers are the hyenas nipping at the heels of the lionized MSM. While there can be overlap in the two groups, generally speaking citizen journalists are eyewitnesses to breaking news stories that phone or email their stories in to the MSM. Bloggers, whose definition is a bit more mottled, generally do the writing themselves and have editorial and creative control over their content. If anything forecasts the future of journalism, the decentralization of the blogosphere might be it.

In 2015, the mythical date when all things will be revealed, my money is on things being largely the same. The Internet will continue to leech viewers while television news will have devolved into a complete punditocracy. But we can see that already from the vantage point of 2005. Ten years from now, we will see the tipping point. Can you guess which way it is going to tip? Your guess is as good as mine. Tell me which direction you think things will fall.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Tags: , ,

Patronize me, please!

With bloggers such as the Poynter Institute’s Jim Romenesko earning an annual salary of almost $170,000 for his efforts, it would appear that the age of blogging for a living is upon us. A media institute like Poynter seems more likely to have a celebrity blogger making six figures, but what about the idea of a patronage system like the one that supported DaVinci, Michelangelo, and the other ninja turtles during the renaissance? That is the game plan being implemented by well-known blogger Jason Kottke.

Kottke quit his job as a web designer in early 2005 as the first step in an experiment to see if he could survive on patronage alone. So far, so good. He is still at it, though he did decide to take Labor Day weekend off. Artists. I tell ya!

Another wrinkle in the future business model of blogging is the corporate blogger. This variation-on-a-flack stratagem is geared towards giving corporations a fresh face and providing key publics with timely information. As WSJ.com mentions, these bloggers don’t make nearly what a celeb like Romenesko pulls down. But I must say, in the world of flackery, it seems to be the place where some heart and soul might filter into the bottom line.

As a relative newbie to the world of blogging, certainly new to following it this closely, I would have to choose Directnic.com’s in-house blog as one of the best efforts thus far to reach key publics. Originally created as a personal blog, this has become a tool to bring the outside world a look inside the chaotic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Directnic.com’s Michael Barnett has catapaulted himself into position as a media darling based on his impassioned response to inhumanity that he saw going on around him. Barnett’s musings have become a must-read for those wanting the inside track on the progress in New Orleans.

Blogs cannot be ignored. Their power and immediacy have brought down media giants. As this information venue continues to develop into a money-making scheme, experiments with advertising, subscription, and patronage systems are likely to continue. Personally, I would love to see a renaissance of patronage. The most romantic of the three models I mentioned, it would allow professional blogging to become something more than the musings of an individual or corporation. The arts might even find a foothold in a blogger’s space, spawning modern masterpieces as-yet untold.

Blogs have been around for years but were only discovered by the mainstream media during Rathergate. Who would have thought that the ugliness of partisan politics would have the ability to spawn a resurrection of the arts?

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Tags: ,