Archive for topic “head on a swivel”

Facebook censors dissent among users

facebook screenshot

Facebook won't allow users to post messages critical of their privacy options, or so I discovered this afternoon.


In the midst of trying to warn my friends, family, colleagues and cohorts on Facebook about a major hole in their privacy and security, I discovered that the problem is far worse than even what I initially was complaining about. I attempted to post the following text as a status update:

Just discovered that facebook implements their security settings haphazardly. So, for instance, if you have a list of people set up so that they don’t have access to your wall, that does not mean that they will, in fact, not have access to your wall. Yet another reason why you should not trust this privacy abomination.

I was subsequently confronted with this error message:

Facebook’s systems block chain letters — like this one — that contain false and misleading information. Please be careful when deciding whether to pass along messages like this. To learn more please read this blog post.

See the screenshot above for evidence. Needless to say, I’m disgusted. This isn’t the first time that Facebook has unjustly censored individuals. Good thing I have my very own trusty news machine, already set on “BLAST”, to fire off this alert to the interwebs.

So what to do now? Quit Facebook? Unfortunately, that doesn’t work. Once you join, they’ve got you. Literally, forever. Well, that’s a bit dramatic. They have you until such time that a non-human citizen of the United States of America (a “corporation”) such as Facebook, one that exists solely to mine data of consumers such as you and me for profit, would freely destroy that data that they are serving to their clients on their far away servers and protected from your prying eyes by byzantine EULAs (ex. 1, 2, 3), swarms of attorneys and spanking-new patents, hot off the printing press. Wait, I guess I wasn’t being dramatic.

Here’s what I recommend: don’t put any information, be it picture, video, thought, phrase, anything you care about, on Facebook, starting today. It isn’t a safe place and anything you put in there, you are likely forfeiting your rights to it. Worse, you may be accepting the onerous task of a prolonged legal battle should you ever want to claim rights to whatever content you are sharing again.

I am not an attorney and this should not be construed as legal advice.

There are plenty of good alternatives out there. Use Twitter and Flickr, or start a blog of your own. It really isn’t difficult, I swear, and with these options you have much more control over your data. You still have to be wary of EULAs, but so far, these organizations haven’t shown the menace that Facebook is brandishing.

I’m now going to try to post this article on Facebook. We shall see what happens. I’ll keep you updated with any developments. Who knows, I may get myself scoble-ized momentarily!

[Update: It posted! Their logic eludes me.]

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Does the swine flu vaccine matter?

Democracy Now: Shannon Brownlee - Does the Vaccine Matter?


If you are looking for a reality check on the media frenzy surrounding the swine flu, here you go. Shannon Brownlee’s latest article in the The Atlantic gives a less-frantic look at H1N1 (swine) flu than you will get most places, though it doesn’t really get into issues of additives in vaccines (immunologic adjuvants, etc.) and other, broader worries about vaccination. For more on the swine flu “emergency”, this is essential. While you are at it, you should check out CBS’ coverage of the overestimation of the number of swine flu cases by the government.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t get vaccinated. I am saying you should have all the information before you do so.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

So then, Max Baucus said to America, “Fuck you!”

That headline neatly paraphrases Senator Max Baucus’ “Framework For Comprehensive Health Reform” insofar as it pertains to the American public. I’ll let you read it for yourself (PDF), if you are so inclined, but here are the key points that make it worthy of outright dismissal:

    1) It contains no public option.
    2) Employers are not required to provide you health insurance.
    3) If you are uninsured, you are fined $750/year/individual and $3800/year/family.

Not only does this not help the 45 million uninsured Americans or the 150+ million under-insured Americans, it doesn’t help small businesses and it doesn’t help doctors, either. Not to mention the standard of health care in this country, which is already a joke in the industrialized world.

Senator Baucus, if you think this plan is so fantastic, implement it immediately for yourself and your fellow Senators. But it sure as hell isn’t good enough for me or any of my friends and family. And one last thing, Senator: if they had the money to pay your proposed fine, the uninsured would have bought health insurance, you fucking prick detestable corporate swine!

Am I really the only one feeling some populist rage about this? What better place than here? What better time than now?

Edit: It should be noted that Baucus’ plan was supposed to be the reasoned answer, the great compromise that would bring everyone in from the cold.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama defends Bush’s warrantless wiretaps

From Wired: “The Obama administration says the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures does not apply to cell-site information mobile phone carriers retain on their customers.”

This tracking ability is a means where the government can find out the location of pretty much everybody without much effort or expense.Jennifer Granick
Civil liberties director, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Bailout hits $5 trillion thus far. I’m numb.

Yes, you read that correctly, that is a “T”. No, we haven’t spent $5 trillion just yet, but we, the people, are now on the hook for that amount. This, according to a report from Forbes.com, citing research firm CreditSights. Yes, feel that bile rise up in your throat. Don’t worry, that is indeed the correct emotional reaction to this calculus.

But then you realize that you have a stalwart government in place, ready to spring into action with alacrity and logic. The man of the hour is Henry Paulson, former CEO of Wall St. investment house Goldman Sachs. Obviously, his recent past as a Wall St. tycoon won’t cloud his vision. Surely he can lead us out of this mess of corporate intanglements and towards a purification of our economic system. Obviously, the days of over-leveraged business practices are gone, right?

Write Congress

and/or

Call Congress

Wrong. Paulson’s answer, according to Jon Taplin and the New York Times: abandon the idea of buying ”troubled assets” (aka the infamous mortgage-backed securities) through the Troubled Assets Recovery Program (TARP). Instead, Paulson will lever up the rest of the $700 billion 20-1 (!!!) to, as Taplin put it, “get some real bang for the buck by loaning to consumer finance companies [aka Credit Card companies].”

Now, I know I graduated from business school way back in the dark ages of 2001, but to my trained eye, this seems to be the exact sort of behavior that got us into this mess in the first place. I agree that buying the mortgage-backed paper is a terrible idea, but 20-1 leveraging as a solution? Give me a break!

Just so we are clear, I’ll spell out my understanding of Paulson’s plan:

  1. Loan the rest of the TARP money to credit card companies.
  2. This, in turn, will keep those companies “lending” to consumers.
  3. This will then keep consumers out in the malls buying unnecessary shit, leveraging themselves even further beyond their means.
  4. Pat self on back for job well-done maintaining status quo that leads inevitably to the complete collapse of our economy.

Read the links. Do your own investigating. If my analysis is wrong, let me know. Then, I suggest you write your lame duck congressional reps and forcefully instruct them that this cannot be allowed to continue.

Two more fun facts for you: since the financial shit really started to hit the fan in September, Bank of America has increased my credit limit twice and Citi just increased my limit by thousands of dollars yesterday.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Staying vigilant on Obama’s promise

I pointed you to the Obama administration’s transition website the other day and said nice things about the potential of inclusion contained therein. Well, it looks like I spoke too soon. As of yesterday, two key pages at change.gov (technology, ethics) have disappeared without explanation. If you didn’t get a chance to view them last week, here are Google’s cached versions of ethics and technology (and just in case those go dark, I’ve got them cached here and here).

The Obama camp says the pages were taken down for “retooling“. I’m unconvinced. This is an incredibly web-savvy political apparatus. It shouldn’t take them this long to retool anything. I’m sorry to say this incident smacks of the secrecy and duplicity of the Bush administration under Cheney.

Am I borrowing trouble? Yes. I want you to steel yourselves to the possible reality that Obama may be nothing more than a great speaker who is just as in the pocket of the corporations as any other politician. Let’s just keep a wary eye cast on what Obama was advocating right out of the gate.

Nobody was holding Bush to this standard when he took office. Well, actually, we still didn’t have a President-Elect at this time in 2000. Antonin Scalia hadn’t voted yet. But these are the cards Obama has been dealt and honestly, there is nothing wrong with a citizenry becoming hyper-vigilant towards their government. In fact, it is about time we did!

Via BoingBoing

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama creates a public megaphone at change.gov

Change.gov? We'll see.

Change.gov? We'll see.


I’ve been seeing far too many people saying they are glad the election is over. They are excited because “now life can go back to normal.” I’ve also heard (and seen) many progressives out there getting a little too excited about Obama’s election. I’m hopeful that change is coming, but let’s be pragmatic here, people. Obama just spent more than anyone in the history of the world to get elected. He voted for the bailout of Wall St. He also voted in favor of granting immunity to the telecom industry for their part in illegal wiretapping of all Americans. There is a lot of “same” in this “change”. I’m not saying that things aren’t going to get better. I just think we all need to keep our head on a swivel and keep this new hope alive by not allowing it to get bogged down in the politics and policies of the same.

That said, I am excited to see the strong moves he has made on the transition front. In particular, I am impressed by the creation of change.gov. It is the web home of the Obama transition team, created to allow us to track the transition. Additionally, it actually asks for citizen input on the transition. However nominal an act, this “megaphone” created by the burgeoning Obama administration is there to listen to the traditionally voiceless public. This, coming even after getting elected, is a good thing. It hearkens back to the days of Andrew Jackson’s big cheese day. Yes, West Wing fans, there actually was a big block of cheese, open to the public, in the White House foyer. Change.gov, just like Jackson’s public cheesing, exists ostensibly so the public can feel connected to the powerful. With that in mind, please remember to keep your head on a swivel, keep your mouth to the earpiece and don’t be so giddy about the prospect of change that you forget to demand real change.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,