Posts tagged “Bush crimes”

Cheney and Rice OK’d waterboarding as early as 2002

“[Waterboarding] consists of immobilizing the victim on his or her back with the head inclined downwards, and then pouring water over the face and into the breathing passages. By forced suffocation and inhalation of water, the subject experiences drowning and is caused to believe they are about to die.”

Today, a Senate report states that former VP Dick Cheney and former National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice both explicitly authorized the torture of prisoners.

Just so we are all on the same page here, there is no question about it, waterboarding is torture and the United States made it official policy to waterboard people. Ergo, it was the offiical policy of the United States to practice systemic torture. Waterboarding “consists of immobilizing the victim on his or her back with the head inclined downwards, and then pouring water over the face and into the breathing passages. By forced suffocation and inhalation of water, the subject experiences drowning and is caused to believe they are about to die.”

Yup, that’s torture. Just like porn, you know it when you see it.

This torture method dates back to the Spanish Inquisition and isn’t a subject up for debate. And yet, we debate. Why, you might ask? That answer could fill a doctoral dissertation, but the abriged answer involves sadistic fucks like Dick Cheney and the 24 hour news cycle.

So, it is resolved that waterboarding is torture. Now that we have that firmly established, what are we going to do with government officials that ordered illegal torture like Cheney and Rice? How about the citizens of the United States that actually tortured people?

Huzzah! That is a subject that can be debated. Thankfully, we have a tried and true method for such debates so we don’t have to debate how we are going to debate. Whew! That’s a relief. What is this method, you ask? We call it…trial by jury. There is no need for Congressional hearings or special commissions. These accused criminals should be processed through the Federal legal system.

Yes, our “justice” system is a charade of the highest order. But if we do not prosecute anyone and everyone who ordered or facilitated torture, regardless of intent or outcome, we are no better than the kangaroo courts of Pakistan that everyone seems so fond of deriding these days. Unlike Pakistan, the United States is supposed to have justice for all, not a separate standard for the ruling elite.

No matter what comes from torturing an individual, be it good information or sadistic pleasure, the torture still occurred and the perpetrator of that torture needs to stand trial. It really is that simple.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EFF still fighting Bush’s unconstitutional wiretaps and the U.S. Congress’ unconstitutional telecom immunity

Believe it or not, I am still interested in things outside the presidential election. I am a big fan and supporter of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). I think their work is some of the most important civil action going on in the United States these days. That’s why I’m so proud they are still fighting for an American public that is largely asleep at the wheel. I’m talking about the unconstitutional wiretapping that has been going on for years (and continues today) with the explicit support of the major telecommunications companies in this country. I’m also talking about the unconstitutional, retroactive immunity that was given to those same companies this past summer by the U.S. Congress (Note: Obama voted in favor of it, McCain didn’t vote on the issue).

Well, the EFF filed suit on Thursday in Federal Court, challenging the constitutionality of both the legislative and executive branches of our government in the above actions. As the EFF filing puts it,

The immunity law puts the fox in charge of the hen house, letting the Attorney General decide whether or not telecoms like AT&T can be sued for participating in the government’s illegal warrantless surveillance,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. “In our constitutional system, it is the judiciary’s role as a co-equal branch of government to determine the scope of the surveillance and rule on whether it is legal, not the executive’s. The Attorney General should not be allowed to unconstitutionally play judge and jury in these cases, which affect the privacy of millions of Americans.Opposition Brief
Electronic Frontier Foundation

Here, here! I’m thankful to have the EFF fighting on my behalf. You should be, too. You can donate to them here.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Quotable: Michael Mukasey

Our Attorney General, driving us further into the Orwellian nightmare that is telecom immunity and the internet “dragnet”:

Specific information demonstrating that the alleged dragnet has not occurred cannot be disclosed on the public record without causing exceptional harm to national security. However, because there was no such alleged content-dragnet, no provider participated in that alleged activity.Michael Mukasey
U.S. Attorney General

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,